Social Robots Group

miLAB, Reichman University

Our robots standing side by side, the two robotic arms on their pedestals, the emergency department robot, the table from the exclusion study with the sphere robot and the robotic arm in the middle, the robotic dog and the two bar stools
Latest from the group

News

    A deep understanding of people lets simple robots have a big impact

    Our research sits where human psychology meets robot design. People automatically read any autonomous movement as a social cue, even when it comes from a robot that looks completely mechanical. Because we start from how people think and feel, we can design very simple, non‑humanoid robots whose small gestures have a large effect on the people around them.

    We study both sides of this effect. Robots can support wellbeing, trust and the relationships between people. They can also lead to exclusion, lower self esteem, overtrust and bias. These negative effects are often overlooked, because robots are usually designed with engineering and efficiency in mind and not with their social consequences. Every robot is social, so its social impact should be designed with care.

    Two women in conversation with the Kip robot on a table between them
    Kip
    A man at a round table with two simple robots, a white sphere and a robotic arm
    Robot to robot to human
    A participant and the robotic dog working side by side
    Robotic dog
    A mobile robot with a small arm
    ED robot
    A participant's hand next to the blue robotic tray
    Robotic tray
    A participant seated next to a tall and a short service robot
    Service robot
    A participant reaching toward a ball on a table shared with two robots
    Robotic ostracism
    Research

    What we asked and what we found

    Our newest studies come first, followed by studies grouped into three areas, how robots change us, when robots do good and when robots do harm. Open a card to read the research question and the main findings.

    Recent

    New from the group

    Basic research

    How robots change us

    People respond to robots in ways they do not notice. These studies show how this happens and how it changes us.

    Positive effects

    When robots do good

    Simple robots can support wellbeing and the relationships between people.

    Negative effects

    When robots do harm

    Some effects are easy to miss when robots are designed only for efficiency. These are the ones we need to be careful about.

    Publications

    Publications

    Full list by year. Each title links to the paper. Source Google Scholar.

    Our platforms

    The robots

    Most of our robots are simple and non‑humanoid. They communicate through movement alone.

    The group

    People

    Prof. Hadas Erel at a table with the group's robots, a white sphere robot, a robotic arm and a row of four small robots
    Group lead

    Prof. Hadas Erel

    Hadas leads the Social Robots Group at miLAB, Reichman University. She brings psychology into the meeting between people and robots to understand how robots affect us, for better and for worse. Her basic research shows how robots in our lives change us, and how to design interactions that are good for people while avoiding what can harm them.

    The team

    Group members

    Engineering

    CS team

    Former members

    Alumni

    Get in touch

    Contact

    For collaborations, student positions or questions about our studies.

    Email

    Open email app

    Where we are

    miLAB, Media Innovation Lab
    Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel